Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations Essay - 2

Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations - Essay Example o not use adaptive strategies to increase profits; they can use them to insure and increase future funding, program effectiveness, and client satisfaction (McNamara, 2007). However, are formal program evaluations necessary in organizations funded by federal and state resources? According to Milstein and Wetterhall (1999), evaluations are â€Å"essential†, despite that fact they are not preformed a regular basis. McNamara (2007) seems to agree with Milstein and Wetterhall and discusses myths of program evaluation and suggests these myths have caused a reduction in program evaluations. The first myth addresses the thought of too much â€Å"useless data† (McNamara, 2007). Often there uncertainties in what program information is necessary for an effective evaluation and useless information is collected (McNamara, 2007). However, during program planning, evaluation methods can be determined to avoid uncertainties and aid in a continual process of program evaluation by using outcome measures. The information gained using outcomes can assist in determining adaptive strategies for the organization (Ginter et al., 2002 and McNamara, 2007). For example, if an organization provides transportation for clients and outcome measures indicate that many clients are not able to use this program due to space limitation, the organization may consider expanding the scope of their transportation program. The second myth is the success and failure of a program (McNamara, 2007). Many individuals look at program evaluation as black and white, either right or wrong. On the contrary, effective program evaluation methods assist in identifying the strengths and weakness of a program. Evaluations can assist the organization in troubleshooting the weaknesses and strengthening the overall program. Using the previous example, the evaluation allowed the organization to see strengths and weakness in the transportation program. The community took advantage of the transportation program (strength)

Homeland Security Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Homeland Security - Assignment Example The character of confrontation has been changing ever since the Vietnam War when in the face of overwhelming firepower of the US, the enemy resorted to guerrilla warfare using the support of local population as one of the main strategies to hit and run. This technique has by now metamorphosed into mindless violence, undertaken by persons indoctrinated to the point of committing suicide while carrying out terrorist strikes. Given the innumerable points around the world and the points of entry into the USA, it is almost impossible to have one hundred percent, foolproof systems to detect, restrain or destroy such persons in good time. Such being the enormity of the task, it calls for constant vigilance and ever improving systems and procedures. The security breach that occurred at the Newark International Airport on Sunday, January 3, 2010, brings home the harsh reality of the potential human and systems failure simultaneously (Wilson, FOXNews.com). Or, take the case of the Nigerian who managed to board the flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Eve. He evaded detection and almost succeeded in bombing the plane, using the explosives strapped inside his under-garments. It was only by luck that he was apprehended. Prior to the incident, he was on the suspect's list and his father had even warned the authorities of his radicalization; yet he managed to board the flight, confirming a failure of information sharing among the security agencies and airport security checking. That the price of freedom is eternal vigilance is once again proved by this episode.

Best Practice in Staff Training Processes

Best Practice in Staff Training Processes 1. INTRODUCTION People performance is a critical enabling factor that influences the potential of an organisation to achieve its objectives. Successful organisations ensure that they maintain an environment which enables the full potential of their people to be realised. They also ensure that they align their staff management objectives with the organisations objectives. Training is an important activity undertaken to ensure employees at all levels have the necessary skills to carry out their roles effectively and to ensure the achievement of the organisations objectives. Of fundamental importance is the identification of the value that training adds to the performance of the organisation. Specifically this relates to how the organisation decides what training is needed by its staff, how the training is carried out, how the organisation evaluates the effectiveness of its education and training activities and what processes are put in place to improve the delivery and effectiveness of education and training programs. The management of the organisation want to know: what training is required how training should be delivered. how the training improves the performance of the organisation Staff expect: targeted and job related training (for now and the future) to equip them to meet the expectations of the organisation defined outcomes as a result of training quality assurance of training materials and delivery techniques value for time spent in training At the time of the writing of this paper, few organisations in the parks industry: had a quantifiable means of measuring organisational performance outcomes had measured the current competence of employees had agreed arrangements in place to meet all their staff training needs. had a formal strategy for addressing staff training so that maximum cost benefits are attained from training had a quantifiable means of assessing the on-ground outcomes of staff training are innovative with regard to methods of making training delivery more efficient use training systems and expertise available in the wider training industry had accurate costings relating to training (salary, training delivery etc) Over the past 5 years there have been dramatic changes in the training arena. Many companies who once conducted their own training now recognise that training is not their core business and utilize the services of the fast developing training industry. This move is in keeping with the Federal Government Training Reform Agenda, aimed at increasing the competitiveness of Australian industry on the international market. The main outcomes from this agenda have been the development of National competency standards and associated training curriculum for a number of industry groups. Best practice in training staff for park management is required because both Federal and State Governments now require park management agencies to: focus on their core business identify key performance indicators and associated priority outcomes be accountable for the delivery of priority outcomes and direct expenditure accordingly apply sound business planning principles to program planning and budgeting evaluate alternative means of service delivery (such as outsourcing) enhance the sustainable management of the natural and cultural resources of parks provide a high standard of customer service and facilities continually improve performance (both financial performance and service delivery) have competent and effective staff. Park customers require parks agencies to: manage the natural and cultural resources of the park using the best possible techniques provide excellent customer service provide a range of recreational opportunities manage financial resources effectively and efficiently have competent and efficient staff This paper will discuss and explore: Best practice in staff training processes for park agencies The use of benchmarking as a tool in establishing best practice. Relevant terms are defined as: Staff training: the process of developing the skills of employees Competence:the ability to deliver a service to a prescribed minimum standard 2. DETERMINING BEST PRACTICE IN STAFF TRAINING PROCESSES 2.1 Methodology In 1995, ANZECC commenced the National Benchmarking and Best Practice Programs aimed at five key areas. The (then) Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Victoria took the lead responsibility for determining the best practice framework for staff training. The objective of the project was to determine current best practice in training processes to assist agenices to develop training programs to meet their needs. The project scope covered: an examination of guidelines and procedures to guide workplace performance an examination of standards of performance (competency standards) training and development programs strategic framework for program development industrial context (relationship of training to pay/promotion etc) identification of learning outcomes, assessment criteria and delivery standards delivery arrangements (in-house or external) assessment practices relationship to formal training structures (State or National) monitoring of training outcomes (improved performance, cost-benefit analysis etc. The project was to result in a report which could be used by member agencies of ANZECC to introduce best practice training processes and to facilitate the development of quality standards (and common competencies) for training of staff involved in the management of National Parks and Protected areas. The report was also to contribute to the development of national training standards through NCRMIRG. The methodology used was to: Conduct initial research into training processes to produce an appropriate survey instrument. Communicate with, visit with or arrange joint meetings with member agencies of ANZECC to: apply the survey observe training initiatives and process Communicate with or visit external organisations with a record of innovation in delivering training programs Prepare a best practice report in consultation with participating agencies There were several project limitations. The project brief did not include a comparison of the content of training programs(as this has already been done by the Natural and Cultural Resources Management Industry Reference Group in its Curriculum Review) but rather required the examination of staff training processes from a strategic viewpoint. The project leaders time was limited to approximately one week and the report was limited to key points. Figure 1 Location of interviews Location Organisation Adelaide South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources Sydney New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service Melbourne Tasmanian Department of Environment and Land Management, Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (name at the time of interview), Australian Fire Authorities Council Phone survey Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage, ACT Department of Urban Services Parks and Conservation. 2.2 Best Practice in Staff Training Processes Initial research was conducted into findings of previous benchmarking projects on staff training and into current concepts of best practice in staff training. It revealed that most organisations measure and assess training inputs rather than training outputs (or how the training was conducted rather than the benefit gained through training). No park agencies and very few other organisations maintain thorough accounting records of staff training and are able to conduct a comprehensive cost benefit analysis of training effectiveness (although some agencies have conducted a cost-benefit analysis of individual courses. Cost benefit analysis is undertaken in the tertiary education sector but the process used is not valid for measuring staff training in organisations for whom training is not core business. 3.1.1 Organisations vision, mission and key performance indicators. The organisations vision, mission and key performance indicators are determined and programs to meet these objectives are planned. The period over which these apply varies with individual organisations. A common factor is that they are reviewed annually as a part of the business/budget planning process. As the performance of staff is a major influence on organisational performance, it is important that the training process is closely linked with the business planning process. 3.1.2 Identification of required competencies for program delivery The organisations key performance indicators (or critical success factors) set a standard against which the performance of the organisation is measured. Programs to meet these standards are developed. The organisation must have access to specific competencies to effectively deliver the required programs and these are determined. Routine competencies required by individual staff are included. Looking ahead to the long term achievement of the organisations vision and mission, competencies required to deliver anticipated work programs in the future are also identified 3.1.3 Identification of current competence of workforce Having determined the competencies required to meet its objectives, the organisation then determines the competencies that exist within its workforce. These are obtained through two means through an analysis of the current performance of staff (annual performance review) and through the identification of the current skill levels staff. Current performance of staff Most organisations now have a performance review process through which the current performance of staff is assessed. Individual staff and workgroups are now required to deliver defined outcomes. Achievement of satisfactory outcomes usually (but not always) indicates a satisfactory level of competence in the task. The non-achievement of outcomes may be attributed to a number of factors. Lack of competence is one factor (amongst others) which may have caused poor performance. A usual part of the performance review process is the identification (by the staff member or their supervisor) of competencies yet to be attained and a plan for their attainment. Assessment of current competence. For the organisation to effectively manage the deployment of their human resources, it is necessary to assess the current competencies held by staff. Stored on a data base, this information is then readily available for use when assigning tasks. The best means of maintaining this data base is to utilize the type of system recommended through the National Training Reform Agenda, where competencies are defined, staff assessed against these and the information is recorded on a data base Assessment of current competence is only effective if the defined competencies have a standard of performance against which the capabilities of the staff can be assessed. This type of assessment is criterion based where the subjectivity of the assessment process is reduced. The process must be well managed and the data base kept current. The maintenance and use of such a data base has two purposes. If the current competence of staff is ascertained prior to delivery of programs, the likelihood of poor performance in program delivery, as a result of lack of competence, is reduced. In addition, the assigning of staff to tasks for which they are not competent may have legal ramifications (for example, Occupational Health and Safety breaches) at a later stage. 3.1.4 Identification of competency gap. Once the competencies held by the workforce are determined, they are measured against those required by the organisation. A gap is identified between the required competencies of the organisation and the existing competencies of its workforce. Traditionally this was considered to be the organisations training needs. Nowadays a wider range of options for closing this gap are considered. 3.1.5 Plan for bridging competency gap The organisation identifies the means by which it intends to obtain the competencies identified by the gap between the required organisational competencies and those held in the existing workforce. This is usually called a workforce management plan. Options for obtaining the required competencies include outsourcing, job redesign or redistribution, recruitment or the training and development of existing staff. Factors influencing the selection of the appropriate option are the cost-benefit analysis, current management constraints and the current Government direction with regard to workforce management. The organisation also needs to look beyond the current budget/business planning cycle to the long term achievement of its vision and mission. It needs to plan to have the necessary competencies (either within or outside the current workforce) for the delivery of future programs (succession planning). This information is invaluable to staff when making personal development/career choices 3.1.6 Organisations training needs The organisations training needs are derived from the above process. They are the required competencies of the organisation, not held by the current staff, for which the training of current staff has been determined as the best means of obtaining them. Training needs are identified and priorities determined as a part of the organisations normal business planning process and as such are reviewed annually. 3.2 STRATEGY FOR RESOURCING THE TRAINING For the organisations training needs to be met efficiently and effectively, there needs to be a clear strategy which addresses the allocation of resources to provide the training. This strategy indicates the level of commitment of the organisation to meet its training needs. Without this statement and a commitment from senior management, the issue of resourcing often arises to become the major impediment to the organisation satisfactorily meeting its training needs. Training resources can be categorised into financial resources, physical resources and human resources. 3.2.1 Financing the training Determining who pays for the training development and delivery is important and clarification of this issue up-front will reduce the incidence of later issues arising. When preparing business plans/budgets, the responsibility for the delivery of the organisations programs is allocated to a particular part of the organisation. This part of the organisation should also ensure that the required training for the delivery of the organisations program is determined and funding for training allocated appropriately. The continuing debate within a number of the ANZECC agencies relating to corporate versus technical training can be resolved by the application of this model. Where the training need is one identified by an individual or their supervisor, and it relates to a routine part of the persons job, then the funding for training should be built into the budget for that job. Where the training need is identified by management and is one which is aimed to impart a change across the organisation, such as the need to train people following the introduction of new technology or a cultural change, then the funding for training should be built into the budget for introducing the change. Budget issues can arise when corporate change training programs are imposed without making the appropriate funding arrangements. 3.2.2 Physical resources Physical resources required for training include the training materials (curriculum, lesson plans, videos, self paced packages etc) and the physical environment for the delivery of formal training. It must be recognised that training is not the core business of most organisations and substantial investment in the development of training materials and training facilities is not considered a wise investment. Fortunately, in recent years, training has become an established growth industry of its own. In most situations it is now not necessary for the organisation to invest in the development of training material or training facilities as there is a wide range of resources available through organisations for whom training IS core business. These include other like organisations, TAFE colleges, universities, local schools, local community training organisations and the increasing number of registered and non-registered private training providers and consultants. The best way of obtaining the necessary physical resources (materials, facilities etc) for training is to obtain them on a needs basis. By integrating the organisations training requirements with those of the wider training community, training becomes more efficient and duplication of effort is reduced. 3.2.3 Human resources Best practice organisations have a culture of continuous learning and are clear about the level of staff involvement expected in the training process. Rather than being the responsibility of a designated training department, training is everybodys responsibility. A primary motivator for individuals to accept this responsibility is need. Through the competency assessment, the individual has identified a need for training in the routine aspects of their work and is more likely to accept the responsibility for organising or participating in training to meet that need. For corporate change training, the individuals need has not been identified and it should be remembered that that person is therefore less likely to be motivated to organise or participate in the required training. In this case it is unrealistic to expect staff to drive their own involvement. Best practice organisations establish a culture where the individual is responsible to a large extent for identifying their own training needs and organising/enrolling in the appropriate training. Such a culture requires the support of a relevant system. The embodiment of learning organisation culture does not negate the need for training roles and responsibilities to be clearly defined. For the organisations training needs to be accurately identified and the training resources available in the wider training industry to be effectively integrated, an appropriate training specialist or specialist team is required to manage training. The training specialist/team will be able to provide staff with adequate systems and information for them to be able to: integrate training with the organisations business planning/budget development process identify their own training needs and those of their staff access a range of relevant training options develop individual training plans based on identified training needs and career aspirations. 3.3 DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY OF THE TRAINING Best practice for the development and delivery of training has been well documented. The model below has widespread use throughout the training industry and is used by the National Training Reform Agenda. 3.3.1 Training needs The identification of training needs was identified in Section 3.1. Training needs are identified in terms that are behavioural (measurable or quantifiable). Cultural change objectives are also quantified so that their achievement can be measured. 3.3.2 Modular training framework For each identified competency there is a training module which will train staff in the necessary skills and knowledge to be able to meet the standard prescribed for that competency. A module specification (the written specification of training outcomes, assessment methods and delivery modes) exists for each module to ensure that it is delivered to a prescribed minimum standard. Module specifications are regularly reviewed to ensure that they match the training requirements of the relevant competency standard. The training is accredited, where possible, by a State or National training authority. Accreditation provides quality assurance for content, delivery and assessment. The employee gains formal recognition and other benefits for the training completed. Training delivery is through appropriate providers. If the training delivery is to be contracted out then the training specification is included as a contract specification. Providers are regularly evaluated for effectiveness and cost efficiency of delivery. 3.3.3 Flexible delivery arrangements The training is located as close to the workplace in order to reduce the amount of time spent in travel and off the job. It is delivered in conditions as close as possible to the normal work situation to ensure relevance of the training to the job. The more flexible modes of delivery, such as distance learning packages (self paced), open learning schemes and computer based training packages are used. The different learning styles and speeds of individuals are catered for. The relevance of the content and delivery standards are monitored against the module specification. Delivery is by instructors who are trained as trainers and are also experienced in the subject matter. 3.3.4 Assessment of learning outcomes Assessment of the individuals achievement of the learning outcomes (as prescribed in the specification) is conducted during and following the learning process. Assessment is criterion based and is applied only by those who are competent in its use and who are authorised by the organisation to conduct assessments. 3.4 APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF TRAINING The trainee is given the opportunity to practice using the new skills on the job under supervision by the supervisor or an appropriate mentor. The complexity of the work situation where the new skills are to be applied is managed so that the application progresses from the simple to the complex. Problems in the application of the new competencies are addressed at an early stage. A final assessment of the application of the new competencies occurs during the performance review phase of program delivery where the delivery of the required job outcomes, to the required standard, is assessed. Where work does not meet the agreed standards, the reason for this shortfall is sought. If lack of competence is the reason, the extent of training required to become competent is determined and the person either referred to further practice under the guidance of a supervisor or mentor or the workforce management planning process revisited. 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANISATIONS WHO PRACTICE BEST PRACTICE IN TRAINING PROCESSES Organisations who are leaders in training have the following characteristics: Senior management understanding of and support for the role training plays in the overall business context. A vision, mission and key performance indicators. A formal link between training and the business planning process (priorities, funding and responsibility). A training specialist employed to integrate organisational training requirements with the services provided by the external training industry. Defined competency standards and assessment system. A workforce management strategy which addresses how to bridge the competency gap. Use a modular approach to meet specific training needs (eg National Training Framework). Use flexible delivery methods and measure learning outcomes at the end of the training. Appraise application of competencies on-the-job (performance appraisal system). Evaluate the benefit training provides to both the individual and to the organisation. CASE STUDIES The following are case studies of the application of best practice in training processes and have been selected from a range of suitable case studies. CASE STUDY 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SOUTH AUSTRALIA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia has introduced a Performance Management Program for all Departmental employees as a part of its overall framework for organisational change. The Performance Management Program aims for continuous corporate performance improvement through the following process: The individuals Performance Management Program is directly linked to the Departments broad strategic goals, the Groups (Division) objectives and the District/Branchs action plans. Performance is assessed at each level on delivery of outcomes. Within the Performance Management Plans, responsibility for delivery of outcomes and for determining and acquiring work skills is clearly defined and documented Line managers are required to: help staff to identify the skill and knowledge required to do their job effectively support staff to establish and meet their individual/team development plan Individuals are responsible for: identifying the skills, knowledge and support they need to do their job effectively work out an individual/team development plan that is linked to performance review the plan regularly. Assessment of training outcomes is based on delivery of required job outcomes. Funding for training is program based. CASE STUDY 2 NATIONAL PARKS SERVICE (DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT), VICTORIA COMPETENCY SURVEY AND DETERMINATION OF TRAINING PRIORITIES FOR ROUTINE TRAINING The National Parks Service (Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria) has developed a framework to deal with the routine training of all staff. In the absence of a set of relevant National competency standards, a comprehensive set of in-house competency standards have been developed covering all aspects of work within the Service. The standards were developed from existing Departmental procedural documents which prescribed the standard of most work within the service. They also related to existing relevant National competency standards such as those from the Tourism and Hospitality industry, the Public Administration sector and the Fire industry. The competency standards were aligned with the Departments Performance and Remuneration Management (PaRM) system and with the Australian Standards Framework. Where possible, the standard referred to an existing NPS or NR+E procedure or guideline. All staff were surveyed against the standards selecting those that applied to their job and career aspirations and then, in conjunction with colleagues and supervisor, compared their current performance with that required by the standards. The end result of the process was an individual training plan listing a range of developmental activities the person was required to take responsibility for plus a list of training needs requiring external facilitation (ie courses). The results of the survey were entered on a spreadsheet and, in consultation with management, priorities for training determined for each park, local areas and the State. CASE STUDY 3 AUSTRALIAN FIRE AUTHORITIES COUNCIL NATIONAL FIREFIGHTING COMPETENCY STANDARDS AND TRAINING COURSES The developments of the Australian Fire Authorities Council (AFAC) have, since 1992, been at the forefront of training developments resulting from the National Training Reform Agenda. AFAC has developed a comprehensive set of generic competency standards which apply to all work conducted within the fire agencies of Australia, including metropolitan, rural volunteer and land management agencies such as the member agencies of ANZECC. The competency standards are arranged in six levels ranging from recruit level to executive level and align with levels 2 to 7 of the Australian Standards Framework. Individual agencies determine the selection of competency standards which apply to their personnel, recognising that the needs of individuals within each organisation vary according to their geographic location and job requirements. Aligned with five levels of the competency standards are five Nationally accredited courses ranging from Certificate II to Advanced Diploma levels. The courses can be delivered in their entirety or by individual modules, of which there are over 200. Training can only be delivered by registered providers and each fire agency either gained registration, formed a partnership with a TAFE college or arranged to contract in an appropriate provider. Instructors must have completed an instructor module or equivalent and have met the requirements of the relevant module. Recognising that the outcomes of training, rather than the input, are most important, a comprehensive National assessor program was established to ensure that assessment practices both within and across agencies were comparable. The assessment process includes Recognition of Prior Learning or RPL where a person who can demonstrate current expertise in the content of a module may be granted credit for that module. One of the most significant parts of the program is the development of distance learning packages for a range of modules. These packages mean that the training can be delivered in the workplace without added costs for travel, accommodation and time lost from work. The courses were developed with a substantial consultation process and are regularly reviewed for relevance. The development of the competency standards, accredited courses and the distance packages bring significant benefits to the fire industry. Firefighters from a range of agencies are now closer to using similar language and techniques and their qualifications are portable across agencies. The material is flexible in design and is intended to be used on a needs basis by individual fire agencies. CASE STUDY 4 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE, TASMANIA PARK RANGER CBT PILOT PROJECT The Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage in Tasmania has been involved in the development of a competency-based course of training for park rangers. The project was conducted by the Department of Industrial Relations and Train Best Practice in Staff Training Processes Best Practice in Staff Training Processes 1. INTRODUCTION People performance is a critical enabling factor that influences the potential of an organisation to achieve its objectives. Successful organisations ensure that they maintain an environment which enables the full potential of their people to be realised. They also ensure that they align their staff management objectives with the organisations objectives. Training is an important activity undertaken to ensure employees at all levels have the necessary skills to carry out their roles effectively and to ensure the achievement of the organisations objectives. Of fundamental importance is the identification of the value that training adds to the performance of the organisation. Specifically this relates to how the organisation decides what training is needed by its staff, how the training is carried out, how the organisation evaluates the effectiveness of its education and training activities and what processes are put in place to improve the delivery and effectiveness of education and training programs. The management of the organisation want to know: what training is required how training should be delivered. how the training improves the performance of the organisation Staff expect: targeted and job related training (for now and the future) to equip them to meet the expectations of the organisation defined outcomes as a result of training quality assurance of training materials and delivery techniques value for time spent in training At the time of the writing of this paper, few organisations in the parks industry: had a quantifiable means of measuring organisational performance outcomes had measured the current competence of employees had agreed arrangements in place to meet all their staff training needs. had a formal strategy for addressing staff training so that maximum cost benefits are attained from training had a quantifiable means of assessing the on-ground outcomes of staff training are innovative with regard to methods of making training delivery more efficient use training systems and expertise available in the wider training industry had accurate costings relating to training (salary, training delivery etc) Over the past 5 years there have been dramatic changes in the training arena. Many companies who once conducted their own training now recognise that training is not their core business and utilize the services of the fast developing training industry. This move is in keeping with the Federal Government Training Reform Agenda, aimed at increasing the competitiveness of Australian industry on the international market. The main outcomes from this agenda have been the development of National competency standards and associated training curriculum for a number of industry groups. Best practice in training staff for park management is required because both Federal and State Governments now require park management agencies to: focus on their core business identify key performance indicators and associated priority outcomes be accountable for the delivery of priority outcomes and direct expenditure accordingly apply sound business planning principles to program planning and budgeting evaluate alternative means of service delivery (such as outsourcing) enhance the sustainable management of the natural and cultural resources of parks provide a high standard of customer service and facilities continually improve performance (both financial performance and service delivery) have competent and effective staff. Park customers require parks agencies to: manage the natural and cultural resources of the park using the best possible techniques provide excellent customer service provide a range of recreational opportunities manage financial resources effectively and efficiently have competent and efficient staff This paper will discuss and explore: Best practice in staff training processes for park agencies The use of benchmarking as a tool in establishing best practice. Relevant terms are defined as: Staff training: the process of developing the skills of employees Competence:the ability to deliver a service to a prescribed minimum standard 2. DETERMINING BEST PRACTICE IN STAFF TRAINING PROCESSES 2.1 Methodology In 1995, ANZECC commenced the National Benchmarking and Best Practice Programs aimed at five key areas. The (then) Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Victoria took the lead responsibility for determining the best practice framework for staff training. The objective of the project was to determine current best practice in training processes to assist agenices to develop training programs to meet their needs. The project scope covered: an examination of guidelines and procedures to guide workplace performance an examination of standards of performance (competency standards) training and development programs strategic framework for program development industrial context (relationship of training to pay/promotion etc) identification of learning outcomes, assessment criteria and delivery standards delivery arrangements (in-house or external) assessment practices relationship to formal training structures (State or National) monitoring of training outcomes (improved performance, cost-benefit analysis etc. The project was to result in a report which could be used by member agencies of ANZECC to introduce best practice training processes and to facilitate the development of quality standards (and common competencies) for training of staff involved in the management of National Parks and Protected areas. The report was also to contribute to the development of national training standards through NCRMIRG. The methodology used was to: Conduct initial research into training processes to produce an appropriate survey instrument. Communicate with, visit with or arrange joint meetings with member agencies of ANZECC to: apply the survey observe training initiatives and process Communicate with or visit external organisations with a record of innovation in delivering training programs Prepare a best practice report in consultation with participating agencies There were several project limitations. The project brief did not include a comparison of the content of training programs(as this has already been done by the Natural and Cultural Resources Management Industry Reference Group in its Curriculum Review) but rather required the examination of staff training processes from a strategic viewpoint. The project leaders time was limited to approximately one week and the report was limited to key points. Figure 1 Location of interviews Location Organisation Adelaide South Australian Department of Environment and Natural Resources Sydney New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service Melbourne Tasmanian Department of Environment and Land Management, Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (name at the time of interview), Australian Fire Authorities Council Phone survey Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage, ACT Department of Urban Services Parks and Conservation. 2.2 Best Practice in Staff Training Processes Initial research was conducted into findings of previous benchmarking projects on staff training and into current concepts of best practice in staff training. It revealed that most organisations measure and assess training inputs rather than training outputs (or how the training was conducted rather than the benefit gained through training). No park agencies and very few other organisations maintain thorough accounting records of staff training and are able to conduct a comprehensive cost benefit analysis of training effectiveness (although some agencies have conducted a cost-benefit analysis of individual courses. Cost benefit analysis is undertaken in the tertiary education sector but the process used is not valid for measuring staff training in organisations for whom training is not core business. 3.1.1 Organisations vision, mission and key performance indicators. The organisations vision, mission and key performance indicators are determined and programs to meet these objectives are planned. The period over which these apply varies with individual organisations. A common factor is that they are reviewed annually as a part of the business/budget planning process. As the performance of staff is a major influence on organisational performance, it is important that the training process is closely linked with the business planning process. 3.1.2 Identification of required competencies for program delivery The organisations key performance indicators (or critical success factors) set a standard against which the performance of the organisation is measured. Programs to meet these standards are developed. The organisation must have access to specific competencies to effectively deliver the required programs and these are determined. Routine competencies required by individual staff are included. Looking ahead to the long term achievement of the organisations vision and mission, competencies required to deliver anticipated work programs in the future are also identified 3.1.3 Identification of current competence of workforce Having determined the competencies required to meet its objectives, the organisation then determines the competencies that exist within its workforce. These are obtained through two means through an analysis of the current performance of staff (annual performance review) and through the identification of the current skill levels staff. Current performance of staff Most organisations now have a performance review process through which the current performance of staff is assessed. Individual staff and workgroups are now required to deliver defined outcomes. Achievement of satisfactory outcomes usually (but not always) indicates a satisfactory level of competence in the task. The non-achievement of outcomes may be attributed to a number of factors. Lack of competence is one factor (amongst others) which may have caused poor performance. A usual part of the performance review process is the identification (by the staff member or their supervisor) of competencies yet to be attained and a plan for their attainment. Assessment of current competence. For the organisation to effectively manage the deployment of their human resources, it is necessary to assess the current competencies held by staff. Stored on a data base, this information is then readily available for use when assigning tasks. The best means of maintaining this data base is to utilize the type of system recommended through the National Training Reform Agenda, where competencies are defined, staff assessed against these and the information is recorded on a data base Assessment of current competence is only effective if the defined competencies have a standard of performance against which the capabilities of the staff can be assessed. This type of assessment is criterion based where the subjectivity of the assessment process is reduced. The process must be well managed and the data base kept current. The maintenance and use of such a data base has two purposes. If the current competence of staff is ascertained prior to delivery of programs, the likelihood of poor performance in program delivery, as a result of lack of competence, is reduced. In addition, the assigning of staff to tasks for which they are not competent may have legal ramifications (for example, Occupational Health and Safety breaches) at a later stage. 3.1.4 Identification of competency gap. Once the competencies held by the workforce are determined, they are measured against those required by the organisation. A gap is identified between the required competencies of the organisation and the existing competencies of its workforce. Traditionally this was considered to be the organisations training needs. Nowadays a wider range of options for closing this gap are considered. 3.1.5 Plan for bridging competency gap The organisation identifies the means by which it intends to obtain the competencies identified by the gap between the required organisational competencies and those held in the existing workforce. This is usually called a workforce management plan. Options for obtaining the required competencies include outsourcing, job redesign or redistribution, recruitment or the training and development of existing staff. Factors influencing the selection of the appropriate option are the cost-benefit analysis, current management constraints and the current Government direction with regard to workforce management. The organisation also needs to look beyond the current budget/business planning cycle to the long term achievement of its vision and mission. It needs to plan to have the necessary competencies (either within or outside the current workforce) for the delivery of future programs (succession planning). This information is invaluable to staff when making personal development/career choices 3.1.6 Organisations training needs The organisations training needs are derived from the above process. They are the required competencies of the organisation, not held by the current staff, for which the training of current staff has been determined as the best means of obtaining them. Training needs are identified and priorities determined as a part of the organisations normal business planning process and as such are reviewed annually. 3.2 STRATEGY FOR RESOURCING THE TRAINING For the organisations training needs to be met efficiently and effectively, there needs to be a clear strategy which addresses the allocation of resources to provide the training. This strategy indicates the level of commitment of the organisation to meet its training needs. Without this statement and a commitment from senior management, the issue of resourcing often arises to become the major impediment to the organisation satisfactorily meeting its training needs. Training resources can be categorised into financial resources, physical resources and human resources. 3.2.1 Financing the training Determining who pays for the training development and delivery is important and clarification of this issue up-front will reduce the incidence of later issues arising. When preparing business plans/budgets, the responsibility for the delivery of the organisations programs is allocated to a particular part of the organisation. This part of the organisation should also ensure that the required training for the delivery of the organisations program is determined and funding for training allocated appropriately. The continuing debate within a number of the ANZECC agencies relating to corporate versus technical training can be resolved by the application of this model. Where the training need is one identified by an individual or their supervisor, and it relates to a routine part of the persons job, then the funding for training should be built into the budget for that job. Where the training need is identified by management and is one which is aimed to impart a change across the organisation, such as the need to train people following the introduction of new technology or a cultural change, then the funding for training should be built into the budget for introducing the change. Budget issues can arise when corporate change training programs are imposed without making the appropriate funding arrangements. 3.2.2 Physical resources Physical resources required for training include the training materials (curriculum, lesson plans, videos, self paced packages etc) and the physical environment for the delivery of formal training. It must be recognised that training is not the core business of most organisations and substantial investment in the development of training materials and training facilities is not considered a wise investment. Fortunately, in recent years, training has become an established growth industry of its own. In most situations it is now not necessary for the organisation to invest in the development of training material or training facilities as there is a wide range of resources available through organisations for whom training IS core business. These include other like organisations, TAFE colleges, universities, local schools, local community training organisations and the increasing number of registered and non-registered private training providers and consultants. The best way of obtaining the necessary physical resources (materials, facilities etc) for training is to obtain them on a needs basis. By integrating the organisations training requirements with those of the wider training community, training becomes more efficient and duplication of effort is reduced. 3.2.3 Human resources Best practice organisations have a culture of continuous learning and are clear about the level of staff involvement expected in the training process. Rather than being the responsibility of a designated training department, training is everybodys responsibility. A primary motivator for individuals to accept this responsibility is need. Through the competency assessment, the individual has identified a need for training in the routine aspects of their work and is more likely to accept the responsibility for organising or participating in training to meet that need. For corporate change training, the individuals need has not been identified and it should be remembered that that person is therefore less likely to be motivated to organise or participate in the required training. In this case it is unrealistic to expect staff to drive their own involvement. Best practice organisations establish a culture where the individual is responsible to a large extent for identifying their own training needs and organising/enrolling in the appropriate training. Such a culture requires the support of a relevant system. The embodiment of learning organisation culture does not negate the need for training roles and responsibilities to be clearly defined. For the organisations training needs to be accurately identified and the training resources available in the wider training industry to be effectively integrated, an appropriate training specialist or specialist team is required to manage training. The training specialist/team will be able to provide staff with adequate systems and information for them to be able to: integrate training with the organisations business planning/budget development process identify their own training needs and those of their staff access a range of relevant training options develop individual training plans based on identified training needs and career aspirations. 3.3 DEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY OF THE TRAINING Best practice for the development and delivery of training has been well documented. The model below has widespread use throughout the training industry and is used by the National Training Reform Agenda. 3.3.1 Training needs The identification of training needs was identified in Section 3.1. Training needs are identified in terms that are behavioural (measurable or quantifiable). Cultural change objectives are also quantified so that their achievement can be measured. 3.3.2 Modular training framework For each identified competency there is a training module which will train staff in the necessary skills and knowledge to be able to meet the standard prescribed for that competency. A module specification (the written specification of training outcomes, assessment methods and delivery modes) exists for each module to ensure that it is delivered to a prescribed minimum standard. Module specifications are regularly reviewed to ensure that they match the training requirements of the relevant competency standard. The training is accredited, where possible, by a State or National training authority. Accreditation provides quality assurance for content, delivery and assessment. The employee gains formal recognition and other benefits for the training completed. Training delivery is through appropriate providers. If the training delivery is to be contracted out then the training specification is included as a contract specification. Providers are regularly evaluated for effectiveness and cost efficiency of delivery. 3.3.3 Flexible delivery arrangements The training is located as close to the workplace in order to reduce the amount of time spent in travel and off the job. It is delivered in conditions as close as possible to the normal work situation to ensure relevance of the training to the job. The more flexible modes of delivery, such as distance learning packages (self paced), open learning schemes and computer based training packages are used. The different learning styles and speeds of individuals are catered for. The relevance of the content and delivery standards are monitored against the module specification. Delivery is by instructors who are trained as trainers and are also experienced in the subject matter. 3.3.4 Assessment of learning outcomes Assessment of the individuals achievement of the learning outcomes (as prescribed in the specification) is conducted during and following the learning process. Assessment is criterion based and is applied only by those who are competent in its use and who are authorised by the organisation to conduct assessments. 3.4 APPLICATION AND EVALUATION OF TRAINING The trainee is given the opportunity to practice using the new skills on the job under supervision by the supervisor or an appropriate mentor. The complexity of the work situation where the new skills are to be applied is managed so that the application progresses from the simple to the complex. Problems in the application of the new competencies are addressed at an early stage. A final assessment of the application of the new competencies occurs during the performance review phase of program delivery where the delivery of the required job outcomes, to the required standard, is assessed. Where work does not meet the agreed standards, the reason for this shortfall is sought. If lack of competence is the reason, the extent of training required to become competent is determined and the person either referred to further practice under the guidance of a supervisor or mentor or the workforce management planning process revisited. 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANISATIONS WHO PRACTICE BEST PRACTICE IN TRAINING PROCESSES Organisations who are leaders in training have the following characteristics: Senior management understanding of and support for the role training plays in the overall business context. A vision, mission and key performance indicators. A formal link between training and the business planning process (priorities, funding and responsibility). A training specialist employed to integrate organisational training requirements with the services provided by the external training industry. Defined competency standards and assessment system. A workforce management strategy which addresses how to bridge the competency gap. Use a modular approach to meet specific training needs (eg National Training Framework). Use flexible delivery methods and measure learning outcomes at the end of the training. Appraise application of competencies on-the-job (performance appraisal system). Evaluate the benefit training provides to both the individual and to the organisation. CASE STUDIES The following are case studies of the application of best practice in training processes and have been selected from a range of suitable case studies. CASE STUDY 1 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SOUTH AUSTRALIA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia has introduced a Performance Management Program for all Departmental employees as a part of its overall framework for organisational change. The Performance Management Program aims for continuous corporate performance improvement through the following process: The individuals Performance Management Program is directly linked to the Departments broad strategic goals, the Groups (Division) objectives and the District/Branchs action plans. Performance is assessed at each level on delivery of outcomes. Within the Performance Management Plans, responsibility for delivery of outcomes and for determining and acquiring work skills is clearly defined and documented Line managers are required to: help staff to identify the skill and knowledge required to do their job effectively support staff to establish and meet their individual/team development plan Individuals are responsible for: identifying the skills, knowledge and support they need to do their job effectively work out an individual/team development plan that is linked to performance review the plan regularly. Assessment of training outcomes is based on delivery of required job outcomes. Funding for training is program based. CASE STUDY 2 NATIONAL PARKS SERVICE (DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT), VICTORIA COMPETENCY SURVEY AND DETERMINATION OF TRAINING PRIORITIES FOR ROUTINE TRAINING The National Parks Service (Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria) has developed a framework to deal with the routine training of all staff. In the absence of a set of relevant National competency standards, a comprehensive set of in-house competency standards have been developed covering all aspects of work within the Service. The standards were developed from existing Departmental procedural documents which prescribed the standard of most work within the service. They also related to existing relevant National competency standards such as those from the Tourism and Hospitality industry, the Public Administration sector and the Fire industry. The competency standards were aligned with the Departments Performance and Remuneration Management (PaRM) system and with the Australian Standards Framework. Where possible, the standard referred to an existing NPS or NR+E procedure or guideline. All staff were surveyed against the standards selecting those that applied to their job and career aspirations and then, in conjunction with colleagues and supervisor, compared their current performance with that required by the standards. The end result of the process was an individual training plan listing a range of developmental activities the person was required to take responsibility for plus a list of training needs requiring external facilitation (ie courses). The results of the survey were entered on a spreadsheet and, in consultation with management, priorities for training determined for each park, local areas and the State. CASE STUDY 3 AUSTRALIAN FIRE AUTHORITIES COUNCIL NATIONAL FIREFIGHTING COMPETENCY STANDARDS AND TRAINING COURSES The developments of the Australian Fire Authorities Council (AFAC) have, since 1992, been at the forefront of training developments resulting from the National Training Reform Agenda. AFAC has developed a comprehensive set of generic competency standards which apply to all work conducted within the fire agencies of Australia, including metropolitan, rural volunteer and land management agencies such as the member agencies of ANZECC. The competency standards are arranged in six levels ranging from recruit level to executive level and align with levels 2 to 7 of the Australian Standards Framework. Individual agencies determine the selection of competency standards which apply to their personnel, recognising that the needs of individuals within each organisation vary according to their geographic location and job requirements. Aligned with five levels of the competency standards are five Nationally accredited courses ranging from Certificate II to Advanced Diploma levels. The courses can be delivered in their entirety or by individual modules, of which there are over 200. Training can only be delivered by registered providers and each fire agency either gained registration, formed a partnership with a TAFE college or arranged to contract in an appropriate provider. Instructors must have completed an instructor module or equivalent and have met the requirements of the relevant module. Recognising that the outcomes of training, rather than the input, are most important, a comprehensive National assessor program was established to ensure that assessment practices both within and across agencies were comparable. The assessment process includes Recognition of Prior Learning or RPL where a person who can demonstrate current expertise in the content of a module may be granted credit for that module. One of the most significant parts of the program is the development of distance learning packages for a range of modules. These packages mean that the training can be delivered in the workplace without added costs for travel, accommodation and time lost from work. The courses were developed with a substantial consultation process and are regularly reviewed for relevance. The development of the competency standards, accredited courses and the distance packages bring significant benefits to the fire industry. Firefighters from a range of agencies are now closer to using similar language and techniques and their qualifications are portable across agencies. The material is flexible in design and is intended to be used on a needs basis by individual fire agencies. CASE STUDY 4 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE, TASMANIA PARK RANGER CBT PILOT PROJECT The Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage in Tasmania has been involved in the development of a competency-based course of training for park rangers. The project was conducted by the Department of Industrial Relations and Train

The gallery report :: Essays Papers

The gallery report â€Å"The poisoning of the American south by Richard Misrach†Ã¢â‚¬  Since the late ‘70s, Richard Misrach has been known for his large format, eight by ten inch color photographs of the Nevada desert. His epic series of 18 Cantos or groups, of photographs range from lyrical to political. The west was a vision or absolute purity, Misrach tries to temper that reverence with the truth about mom’s occupation of the land. In 1999, Misrach accepted a commission from Atlanta’s High museum of art as part of their â€Å"Picturing the South†. He chase to photograph Louisiana’s infamous cancer alley, for decades oil refineries and fertilizer plants have dumped their pollutions into the Mississippi river along this 150-miles stretch between New Orleans and Baton Rough. The Mississippi is the dominant river basin North America and drains more that 1.2 million square miles or about 40 percent of the continental United State. It provides 18 million people with drinking water, 1.5 million in Louisiana alone. The Salton Sea The Nature Trail on the West Shores of the fabulous Salton Sea is a three mile adventure along the shores of the Sea. Visitors can see a mixture of birds, native cacti, and wild flowers. The West Shores bird sanctuary borders on the beautiful greens of the Salton City Golf Course. The Bird Watch and Nature Trail, by a MAJOR FLYWAY, is host to over 250 species of birds and 96 accidentals. Migratory birds include Canada geese, snow geese, American avocetes, eared grebes, black-necked stilts, green-winged teals, brown & white pelicans, Scott's orioles, redstarts, burrowing owls, mountain plovers, long-billed dowitchers, long-billed curlews, marsh wrens, and ruddy ducks. Every year the Salton Sea International Bird Festival attracts thousands of bird lovers from around the world. Gentile da Fabriano, â€Å"Adoration of the Magi† Palla di Noferi Strozzi commissioned this famous altarpiece, signed and dated 1423 on the frame, for his family's chapel in the church of Santa Trinita in Florence. Wealth and culture of the donor are reflected in the lavish use of gold and in the pomp of the Magi procession, including also exotic animals as leopards and monkeys. If in this picture clearly emerges the persistence of International Gothic at the beginning of 15th Century, in the meanwhile the panel is ahead of its time showing in the propeller’s scenes (Nativity, Rest during the Flight into Egypt and Presentation to the Temple) one of the basic innovations of Renaissance art: the blue sky at the place of the traditional gold background

American Military Might

Present American military and law enforcement agency might has been put to a test both internally and externally in recent years. With the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, which was born, in large part, in response to the events of September 11, resources for battling terrorism have increased. Nevertheless, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have shown that the United States is not adequately equipped militarily to confront and defeat sophisticated terrorist operations.While there has been a decrease in  terrorist acts occurring in the United States, acts of terrorism abroad have not decreased. Clearly, the adequacy of military planning and military preparedness has been called into question. Douglas Bodero (1999) has identified four major theological extremist areas. These four groups are apocalyptic cults, Black Hebrew Israelism, the Christian Identity movements, and white supremacy religions. Doomsday cults believe that they must take offensive action in order to b ring about the end of the world (White:2002). These beliefsform the basis and justification for the use of violent methods which are often directed at the United States. â€Å"†¦ (T)errorist weapons are increasingly sophisticated and deadly. † (White: 2002). Osama bin Laden excluded, intelligence agencies in the United States have been highly successful in locating and identifying terrorist group leaders. Unfortunately, the failure to obtain intelligence from Middle East sources before terrorist acts occur has often been a challenge for the United States military and law enforcement agencies.This -1- is demonstrated by the failure to win battles in the Vietnam, Korean, and Iraq Wars. While the United States certainly has a tremendous military advantage with highly technological weapons, including nuclear weapons and satellite surveillance, access to nuclear weapons has no advantage unless the United States is willing to use such weaponry. Treaties with the United Nations have outlawed the use of nuclear weapons by any country. By doing, the United States has no ability to use such military might.In the countries previously described, ground war tactics and guerrilla warfare have proved a match with American troops (White:2002). The unpopularity of the military draft, which originated in the Vietnam era, has prevented the United States from building sufficient troops needed in fighting terrorism and state-sponsored terrorism. Clearly, the United States simply has insufficient troops to battle terrorism occurring abroad. An increasing trend comes in the form of state-sponsored terrorism. Libya, Syria,and Iran are but some of the many countries which finance and provide weaponry and safe havens to terrorist groups. In the past, terrorist training camps located in Afghanistan have assisted in training aspiring terrorists from all over the world, including the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) (White:2002). In order to make a dent in preventing terrorism, the United States must recognize that a policy which publicly states that â€Å"We will not negotiate with terrorists† is often an impossibility. Certainly, the British initially believed that rogue colonies in the AmericanRevolution were terrorists and Britain used that policy to no avail. The policy which is advanced herein ignores basic crisis negotiation tactics. Just as police must negotiate with -2- kidnappers and hostages to prevent harm to citizens, it is asserted here that the major conflicts could be mitigated and prevented (to some extent), with a different ideology in dealing with the â€Å"terrorists† and terrorist groups involved in the Iraq Civil war. CITATION White, J. (2002). Terrorism: An Introduction (4th Ed. ). Belmont:CA Wadsworth. -3-

Paleolithic and Neolithic Essay

The Paleolithic and Neolithic eras were in different periods of time even though they had similarities and differences in social, economic, and political areas. The Paleolithic era or â€Å"old stone age† the cultural period of the Stone Age that began about 2.5 to 2 million years ago, marked by the earliest use of tools made of chipped stone. The principle of the characteristic of the Stone Age was that human being hunted wild animals or gather edible products of naturally grown animals for food. The Neolithic era or Agricultural Revolution was a marker event that change food gathering to food producing and transformed human society. Paleolithic and Neolithic eras had much in common in social, economic, and political areas. Paleolithic and Neolithic eras had many similarities in political structures. In the Paleolithic era leaders emerged in each tribe, but none of them had wealth because of the constant moving for resources. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras both had some sort of leader or leadership although the Neolithic Era had a complex organized government the Paleolithic era had a group leader to make the decisions for the tribe consisting of a small amount of people. The Paleolithic and Neolithic also differ in political structures because the Paleolithic era only had a small group of people led by a group leader because of the constant moving they had to do to get resources. However the Neolithic era had a complex government because of the growth of population due to food surplus when they settle down at a resourceful location. Paleolithic and Neolithic eras had many similarities in social structures. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic era each gender had a role in society, but later on the Neolithic era the men’s role was superior to the women’s role. In the Paleolithic era men hunted and women gathered, everyone in society was equal and no one was above only the gods they worshiped were the only higher ones than them. The Neolithic and Paleolithic era differ in social structures because in the Paleolithic era women had drop down in the equality between men and women because men took over both the care of animals and plants therefore women were led to domestic chores but were not essential to the survival of the village. In the Paleolithic era gender  equality was extended even further to relations between sexes and all members of a tribe made important contributions to the survival of the community. The Paleolithic and Neolithic era had many similarities and differences in economics. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic era agriculture and trade was an economic resource. In the Paleolithic era meat had a high value over everything else they use to trade.In both Neolithic and Paleolithic era trade was done by both eras, but in the Neolithic Era there were much resources to trade because of the development of agriculture. In the Paleolithic era hunting and gathering economy practically prevents individuals from accumulating private property and basing social distinctions on wealth. In the Neolithic era specialization would make all the work more efficiently and raise the economy of the city. The Paleolithic and Neolithic eras had similarities and differences in social, economic, and political areas. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras each gender had a role in society but later on in the Neolithic era the men’s role was superior to the women’s role. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras both had some sort of leader or leadership although the Neolithic Era had a complex organized government. In the Paleolithic and Neolithic eras trade was done by both eras but in the Neolithic Era there were much more resources to trade because of the development of agriculture. The Paleolithic and Neolithic eras were very much familiar and differently.